Want to make a difference in the lives of children in need? Group sponsorship is a cost-effective and impactful way to do it.
Group sponsorship can significantly impact a community, as it can provide education, healthcare, and other essential services to a whole group.
Here is a table comparing the pros and cons of GroupLink and child sponsorship.
| GROUPLINK | CHILD SPONSORSHIP PROGRAMS | |
| Impact | High Community-Wide Impact: The support provided through group sponsorship affects a larger community or group rather than just an individual child. | Impact on Individual: There might be other children within the same community who do not receive the same level of assistance and support |
| Flexibility | More flexible: Supporters can change their sponsorship arrangement anytime, allowing for adjustments based on changing circumstances. | Lacks flexibility: Once you start sponsoring a child, you are committed to supporting that child for a set period and under the terms of the sponsorship program. |
| Community engagement | High Community Engagement: Since it has a broader impact, it requires more active community members’ and supporters’ involvement. | Low Community Engagement: It only focuses on an individual child, rather than the community. |
| Cost | More cost-effective: The resources contributed by multiple supporters are pooled together to address the needs of a larger group. | Less cost-effective: The resources are directed towards the needs of a single child. |
